Archive for the ‘Opinion’ Category

Radically changed new Cabinet for Singapore announced by PM Lee

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the new Cabinet last night. The previous 21-member cabinet has been reduced to 15, with the departure of 9 ministers and introduction of 3 new faces, which includes two freshly elected Members of Parliament.

At the same time, PM Lee has accepted the resignations of SM Goh and MM Lee from the Cabinet.
21 <– ministers in the previous cabinet.

ministers in the new cabinet –>  15

9 <– ministers that are leaving
new faces joining the new cabinet –>  3
2 <– former prime ministers quit
new MPs entering cabinet –> 2

My chiropractor loves tablets … the electronic kind

Monday, May 16th, 2011
Overheard at a chiropractor’s session: the chiropractor was seeing more and more people for pains arising from usage of tablets.

Couldn’t help overhearing the chiropractor talking to a fellow patient in an adjacent cubicle as I was being put through the interferential electrotherapy treatment.

Do chiropractors love tablets?The guy started by commenting that many people going through their mid-life crisis are jumping into marathons without realising what it was going to do to their bodies many years downstream when they grow old – especially if they did not go through the necessary build-up training and if they’ve never gone through a marathon in their younger days before.

Then he went on to observe how he is seeing more and more people for pains and aches arising from the use of tablets. His chiropractic business has seen a pick up from the number of people coming in to see him since tablets started becoming popular.

Something about the weight of the device and having to hold/prop it up in one hand for prolonged periods of time while gesturing with the other hand. Now that more tablets are being introduced by the day and people are buying more and more tablets, this chiropractor must be laughing to the bank, going by his anecdotal correlation between the proliferation of tablets and the health of his business.

Maybe I should reconsider that marathon and think twice about that sleek tablet I’d just read about yesterday …

MM and SM resign from Singapore Cabinet

Saturday, May 14th, 2011
A week after a General Election that the ruling PAP won but would rather forget, the two former Prime Ministers have tendered their resignations to leave the Cabinet. PM Lee Hsien Loong has yet to accept their resignations but will give his answer by Monday.

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's first Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew was the first Prime Minister of Singapore for 31 years from 5 June 1959 – 28 November 1990, while Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong led Singapore for 14 years from 1990 till 12 August, 2004.

Lee Kuan Yew was appointed to the newly created post of Ministor Mentor on 12 August 2004. He is the founding father of Singapore and brought Singapore from a fledgling, newly-independent, former-colonial state barely able to survive – to a modern society able to hold its own.

Goh Chok Tong further brought Singapore forward and steered the nation through the choppy waters of the Asian Financial Crisis.

The 7-day old General Election was a “watershed” election for the PAP in the groundswell of vociferous resentment against the ruling party, especially on the Web. The anger towards a party widely perceived to have become arrogant and who have lost touch with the populace translated on polling day to the lowest overall percentage of support for the party since the independence of the country in 1965.

Although the PAP still won an overwhelming majority in terms of number of seats in Parliament (81 out of 87), the party brought in only 60.1% of the votes nation wide.

MM Lee Kuan Yew

MM Lee had enjoyed the only walkover in this General Election – their would-be opponents having been ruled out of contest for submitting their paperwork 35 seconds late. However, he had drawn the ire of the Malay community through his comments about the Malays in a book he had published just months prior to the election.

MM Lee also drew much flak for his comments during the hustings that the voters in the hotly contested Aljunied GRC (Group Representation Constituency) would have five years to “repent” if they voted out the incumbent PAP team of MPs.

The contesting team of heavyweights from the Workers’ Party won the GRC by a large margin of 10% – the first time an opposition party has been able to oust a PAP team in a GRC.

SM Goh Chok Tong

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, Prime Minister from 1990 to 2004SM Goh has always enjoyed extremely strong support from the electorate. In the 1991 General Election, he brought in 77% of the vote for his Marine Parade GRC. In the by-election in 1992, he repeated the resounding victory with 73% of the votes. Since then, he has enjoyed walkovers in the next three Generel Elections in 1997, 2001, and 2006 as Opposition candidates shy-ed away from his stronghold.

This election, however, saw voter support for the team of candidates led by him whittled down to 57%, one of the lowest amongst PAP’s candidates. A large part of the plunge in popularity for the team can be attributed to the popularity of one Nicole Seah of the opposing team, and the correspondingly unpopularity of Tin Pei Ling – a member of SM Goh’s team.

Both Nicole Seah and Tin Pei Ling were the youngest candidates in the opposition and ruling parties respectively – roped in to appeal and connect to the young generation of vociferous voters unafraid to voice their political convictions openly on the Web.

Whilst 24-year-old Seah captured the imagination and support of the populace, the 28-year-old Tin was reviled for her perceived relative immaturity.

It did not help his GRC team when some perceived SM Goh as resorting to personal attacks on his former PPS (Principal Private Secretary) who had joined the opposition. Netizens also pointed out that in so doing, SM Goh had violated his earlier statement of not commenting on candidates outside of Marine Parade.

His dismissal of the opposition team in Marine Parade as coming from the No-Substance-Party (pun on their actual party name National Solidarity Party) was also atypical of his image as a kindly and benign statesmen way beyond the name-calling and mud-slinging tactics of lesser politicians.

Turning of the tide

Against this slew of mis-steps were the national issues that the Opposition candidates brought to the fore during the campaign.

These issues include: high costs of living, high costs of public housing, high ministerial pay, overcrowded public transportation system, influx of foreign talent, mistakes such as the under-budgeting of the Youth Olympics Games and escape of terrorist Mas Selamat, the need for more opposition voices in the Parliament, and the perceived arrogance of the ruling party.

Midway through the hustings, the ruling party must have realised that the tide had turned against them. The slew of attacks from PAP candidates – calling the opposition “poison mushrooms”, labelling a potential coalition government as an ineffective “rojak” parliament, questioning an opposition town council’s accounts in the midst of hustings to throw suspicion on their trustworthiness – were not only failing to alienate the electorate from opposition candidates, but were possibly driving voters to support the opposition.

Lee Hsien Loong Prime Minister of Singapore from 2004As a last ditch attempt to salvage whatever votes that could be saved, the Prime Minister himself issued an unprecedented apology during a lunch-time rally in the business district for past mistakes and promised to try better. This change of strategy was taken up by other PAP candidates who suddenly adopted a contrite attitude and started to appear modest, apologising profusely and promising to work harder.

I’m sure this helped, in no small measure, to stem the flow of votes to the opposition and I commend the PM for being responsive enough and having the leadership and gumption to pull off this change in strategy so quickly and abruptly. It seemed that he even managed to gag the MM from making further damaging comments after the latter’s “repent” remarks.

Starting from a clean slate

Now that the General Election is behind us, all eyes are on the ruling party – whether it would be able to transform itself into one that genuinely cared and listened to the electorate.

People within and outside the PAP know that this is critical in ensuring the dominance – or even survival – of the ruling party in the next election. And the PM has promised change. The question is whether the mammoth of a party can really change, or will it be old wine in a new bottle.

I am guessing these two resignations are not individually motivated, but have been discussed at length within the PAP, as part of a slew of changes for the party. MM Lee’s departure would hopefully placate the Malays in the populace and convince people that PM Lee has a free hand to reform the party.

SM Goh’s departure? Probably a face-saving move to avoid having MM make a lonesome exit. At any rate, the two will probably continue to be employed as consultants to oversee areas of responsibilities they’ve been responsible for all this while. And that’s being wise considering the extensive experience and competencies embodied in these two senior statesmen, and the networks they have built up over the years.

What remuneration they would get in place of the unpopular but transparent ministerial pays they have been drawing would certainly draw keen public interest.

At any rate, it is a significant and symbolic move by PM Lee to signal how seriously the party is in transforming the party into one that is caring and connected to the people.

Full press statement

Below is the joint-email statement to the media from the two leaders and former Prime Ministers in full:

“We have studied the new political situation and thought how it can affect the future. We have made our contributions to the development of Singapore. The time has come for a younger generation to carry Singapore forward in a more difficult and complex situation. The Prime Minister and his team of younger leaders should have a fresh clean slate. A younger generation, besides having a non-corrupt and meritocratic government and a high standard of living, wants to be more engaged in the decisions which affect them. After a watershed general election, we have decided to leave the cabinet and have a completely younger team of ministers to connect to and engage with this young generation in shaping the future of our Singapore.

But the younger team must always have in mind the interests of the older generation. This generation who has contributed to Singapore must be well-looked after.”

The day after the General Election 2011

Sunday, May 8th, 2011

The results of the General Election 2011 are out – PAP has been returned to power with 81 out of 87 parliamentart seats. Workers’ Party has done extremely well by not only retaining their Hougang SMC, but have managed to capture the Aljunied GRC as well.

What will the next Parliament look like? It will comprise 81 elected MPs from PAP, 6 elected MPs from the Workers’ Party, 2 NCMPs from the Workers’ Party, 1 NCMP from the SPP, and 9 NMPs, assuming both the Workers’ Party and SPP accept the NCMP seats.

Like many other Singaporeans, I stayed till past 3 am this morning to hear the charismatic Returning Officer announce the results of each and every contested constituency in the General Election.

Reams of post-election analysis and opinions have already been churned out and more will follow, so I’ll just share just 5 statements which I feel characterise the outcome of this election.

Perhaps a year from now when the dust has settled, and you’re looking for a concise summary of what General Election 2011 was like, the five statements will paint a quick characterisation of what transpired.

Feel free to let me know if you think some other statement should be included in lieu of any of the following list:

People's Action Party (PAP)

People's Action Party (PAP)

1. It is an election that the ruling PAP would rather forget

The PAP brought in 60.1% of the overall vote – the lowest since independence in 1965. It is also 6.5% lower than the previous 66.6% in 2006.

2. This is the first time the Opposition has managed to capture a GRC
Workers' Party (WP)

Workers' Party (WP)

Many see the GRC system as a scheme that makes it difficult for the Opposition to win because of their previous inability to produce enough nominees of adequate quality and racial composition.

Many also believe it allowed strong anchor PAP ministers to parachute in new PAP candidates, and to some extent, assure any senior but unpopular PAP ministers of reelection.

3. The electorate prefer a more compassionate approach rather than an arrogant attitude.

National Solidarity Party (NSP)

National Solidarity Party (NSP)

Passionate, heartful campaigning epitomised by the youngest candidate Nicole Seah from the NSP overshadows the traditional intellectual, above-it-all, know-it-all, we-know-what’s-best-for-you attitude of the ruling party. This made Seah the media darling and champion of the underprivileged who fell-through-the-cracks.

It also forced the ruling party to switch from a be-careful-of-your-property-and-asset-value stance at the beginning of the campaign to a so-sorry-we-did-make-some-mistakes-and-we’ll-try-better positioning for the second half of the hustings.

4. All-or-nothing gambit failed for veteran Chiam See Tong

Singapore People's Party (SPP)

Singapore People's Party (SPP)

While Workers’ Party Low Thia Khiang pulled off his gamble of venturing out from his Hougang SMC and vying for the Aljunied GRC, the same gamble by well-loved SPP Chiam See Tong to move out of Potong Pasir and move for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC failed.

Workers’ Party emerged as the strongest Opposition party whose overall campaign results and party discipline has greatly strengthened the party’s brand name to be an asset to its members in future elections.

Reform Party (RP)

Reform Party (RP)

5. Coming of age for social media and a new generation of young voters

The proliferation of social media, coupled with the political awareness of a new generation of young voters has fueled an increased assertiveness of the electorate.

The Internet provided extensive coverage of Opposition campaigning and served as an avenue for opposition supporters to express and share their political views and opinions.

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)

Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA)

Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA)

It is a much sought after alternative for traditional local mainstream media which is perceived by many to be biased against the Opposition in their coverage.

Singaporeans vote for their government today

Saturday, May 7th, 2011

Today is polling day for the General Election in Singapore. Citizens vote today for the Members of Parliament who will manage their constituencies and estates, and represent them in Parliament.

The political party with the majority will also form the government for the next five or so years until the next election.

Polling stations across the island nation opened at 8 am local time to voters selecting their representatives in Parliament. The polling stations will remain open for voting until 8 pm tonight.

The neighbourhood school across the road from where I live has been designated as the polling station where residents around my neighbourhood will cast our votes.

As I walked towards the school with the Poll Card in my hands, I couldn’t help but muse that I was holding in my hands about the only tangible manifestation of what being a Singaporean Citizen entails – the right to vote.

Gripped in my hands was my voice. With it, I get to say who I want to represent me in the government. The most wonderful thing about it all is that everybody – whether you’re rich or poor, whether you’re from the establishment or whether you’re disenfranchised – gets exactly one vote. Nobody’s voice is louder than that of another.

The slogan “One man, one vote” has never sunk in so vividly until you walk with this IC-sized slip of paper towards a ballot box, especially since in this election, it can really make a difference as to who gets elected.

A poll card to exchange for a voting slip at the polling station

A poll card to exchange for a voting slip at the polling station

For this election, 2,350,873 citizens will decide who the 87 MPs representing 27 constituencies are. 12 of the constituencies are SMCs (Single Member Constituency) while 15 are GRCs (Group Representation Constituency where the constituency is represented by a team of candidates rather than a single person).
Unlike past elections, where many constituencies are unchallenged by opposition parties and enjoy walkovers even before the polling day, in this election – only one constituency has enjoyed a win without a fight.

The 5-member team headed by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew in Tanjong Pagar GRC was returned into office on Nomination Day when their would-be opponents from the opposition failed to submit their paperwork in time. They were deemed to be 35 seconds late and the 139,771 electors in the constituency – some 6 percent of the overall electorate – will not have the chance to vote in this election.

Nevertheless, there are still 82 parliamentary seats up for grabs and the hustings this election has proven to be more intense than ever before, with the opposition presenting many credible and eminently qualified candidates who were able to enunciate why the voters should support them and what they can do for the nation.

Unsettling for the incumbent party, the voting public – at least based on any casual browsing of social websites on the Internet and overwhelming attendance at opposition rallies – seemed to resonate with opposition candidates.

How did I vote this morning? I voted – wisely.

Polling day for General Election 2011

BlackBerry PlayBook Launch

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

The 7-inch tablet from Research In Motion (RIM) hits the shelves in the US today. Here’s a quick roundup of the likes and dislikes from those who have tried out the shipping version of the BlackBerry PlayBook.

RIM PlayBookThere’s a lot to like about the PlayBook, but there’re also plenty of frustrations out there from those who’ve had the privilege of playing with the PlayBook. The general feel seems to be that the PlayBook has the potential to be something great – just that it’s not quite complete at the moment.

Already behind the iPad 2 and other Android tablets in terms of launch date, my feel is that RIM wants to get the hardware out as soon as possible before the specs get old – even though the software isn’t quite as ready yet.

RIM PlayBookDare I compare that with an evolutionary release of the iPad 2 with bigger steps only to be expected for the upcoming iPad 3?

With such stiff competition in the tablet market, it is no wonder these slate-makers are rolling off their products as soon as possible. In all honesty, I do believe RIM will sort out the grouses that reviewers have complained about, but the question is whether consumers are willing to fork out the dough to buy what’s beginning to be perceived as an unfinished product, that is only going to be made complete after a few more months – if ever.

RIM PlayBookPerhaps, RIM should have launched it at a discounted price – you know, an early bird discount – to entice consumers and grab market share. Given that the hardware is fabulous, the discount may have worked to convince consumers to buy first and wait out for the software to catch up.

At any rate, below is a quick round-up of the likes and dislikes from people who has played with the PlayBook so far. Prices for the 16, 32 and 64-gigabyte models in the US are $500, $600, and $700 respectively.

Likes Dislikes Mitigation
Fabulous display, and user interface Tiny recessed power button difficult to find and press Nothin’ much can be done about this – but do I care?
Sleek:
10mm / 0.4 inch thick 

Light:
0.9 lbs / 425 g

No native email, messenger, contacts and calendar Need to be Bluetooth tethered via a BlackBerry smartphone to access these. 

Native support could be added later on

Lightning fast processor No 3G connection 3G version in summer 

4G version end 2011

Impressive multi-tasking Small repository of Apps (~3,000) Compatibility with selected Android apps to be introduced later, plus build-up of PlayBook specific apps.
Supports Flash and HTML5 No video chat Video chat app to be released later.

Japan earthquake-tsunami-nuclear disaster: photo remembrance

Sunday, March 27th, 2011

At last, the death toll from the triple disaster in Japan has passed 10,000 – with 17,000 more unaccounted for. Many people like myself are tremendously saddened by the tragedy.

Here’s a simple collection of photos that I’ve taken over the years in Japan – photos that bring back pleasant memories of a beautiful country with a wonderful culture, and most importantly hospitable and kind people that I’ve had the privilege of encountering.

In the sea of depressing scenes depicting the horrors of the disasters, hopefully these photos will help remind us of the beautiful Japan.

I love visiting Japan. It is a wonderful place to bring a family with young kids. It is clean, safe and systematic. No need to worry about food poisoning, walking late at night, or the trains to be late.

As you can guess from the many photos taken in Japan that I’ve used as illustrations for my photo-editing stories, I visit Japan an awful lot – almost every year with the family. My wife and I have lived in Japan before and we love the culture and the food, and especially – the sincerity of the people we’d met during our stay.

Most of the photos had appeared in previous photo-editing articles. I know there are a lot of workers and volunteers out there risking life and limb to help with disaster relief right now. This is just a little something that I’d like to contribute in my own way.

Each of the photo contains a link to a charity for victims of the disasters to make it convenient for you to make a contribution should you wish to. None of the charities linked to are related to me in any way. Please do your own checks on those charities before contributing.

Help the victims of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disasters in Japan

http://www.redcross.org.sg/Japan-Disaster-2011.phtml

http://www.savethechildren.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=8rKLIXMGIpI4E&b=6478615&ct=9170883&msource=wellpaqkf311

http://www.convoyofhope.org/go/headlines/entry/earthquake_and_tsunami_strike_japan

http://www.globalgiving.org/projects/japan-earthquake-tsunami-relief/

http://www.shelterbox.org/

http://www.give2asia.org/japantsunami-2011

http://www.internationalmedicalcorps.org/Page.aspx?pid=1970

http://www.savethechildren.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=8rKLIXMGIpI4E&b=6478615&ct=9170883&msource=wellpaqkf311

http://jasonkelly.com/helpjapan/

https://www.mercycorps.org/donate/japan

http://www.medicalteams.org/sf/Home.aspx

http://www.msf.org/msf/donations/donations_home.cfm

http://www.redcross.org.sg/Japan-Disaster-2011.phtml

http://www.convoyofhope.org/go/headlines/entry/earthquake_and_tsunami_strike_japan

http://www.globalgiving.org/projects/japan-earthquake-tsunami-relief/

http://www.give2asia.org/japantsunami-2011

http://www.google.com/crisisresponse/japanquake2011.html

iPad 2 launch on 2 Mar?

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Have you received the invitation from Apple?

Apple's invitation for the 2 March event

Apple emailed the invitation to a media event in San Francisco that showed a calendar page with the date 2 March and the top right corner of the page peeling back to reveal an iPad underneath. The peek-a-boo iPad suggests that Apple may unveil its new version of the iPad during the event.

Earlier reports from Taiwan-based Yuanta Securities had surmised that the iPad launch might be delayed to June this year because of production bottlenecks at the China production line of Hon Hai – Apple’s Taipei-based contract manufacturer.

Will the iPad 2 be announced on 2 Mar?Indulging in my own bit of speculation, both schools of thought may not be untrue. We might actuallly see an iPad announcement on March 2 followed by the taking of orders, with deliveries only materialising in June, probably staged out based on country.

What with the legion of Android tablets being unveiled by the day, with specs that trounce the year old iPad, any delay in unveiling the upgraded specs of iPad 2 could create a negative impression in people that the iPad is inferior to Android tablets.

The announcement of iPad2 with all the specs that has been rumoured to ship with it should maintain its aura of invincibility that over challengers.

Apple certainly won’t want to announce the iPad 2 in June only to have people yawn at its specs, since by then it may already have been featured on the Android tablets out there.

Samsung’s Android-based Galaxy Tab was launched last year and was well-received. Motorola’s Xoom Android-based tablet goes on sale today, while Research In Motion plans to release four versions of its Playbook this year.

The original iPad went on sale on April 3. Announcing the iPad 2 on March would mean that it will follow an annual cycle of updates like the iPhone and iPod.

4G network in Singapore as early as this year?

Monday, January 24th, 2011

Not so fast. In theory, it is possible to see 4G implemented in Singapore as early as this year. In reality, when we really see 4G take off in Singapore depends on many factors: roll-out by telcos, launch of smartphones and tablets by device makers, availability of compatible peripherals like dongles, and most important of all, applications to exploit the higher speed.

IDA announced its blueprint for the rollout of a 4G network in Singapore today. But don’t jump for joy yet – it is more a roadmap for early planning by the telcos to implement their versions of the network.

Logo of IDA4G refers to the fourth generation of wireless-mobile standards and can be five to 10 times faster than current 3G networks. Downloading a video will become real fast. Maybe you can play those mean bandwidth-hungry games on your smartphones too.

The two main announcements on the rollout of Singapore’s 4G network address the immediate term from now to 2015, and the subsequent landscape beyond 2015.

Between now and 2015

Today, five companies SingTel, StarHub, M1, QMax and PacketOne hold the rights to use the 2.3/2.5 Ghz spectrum for wireless broadband access. SingTel, StarHub and M1 also holds the rights to use the 900/1800MHz bands for 2G mobile services. In 2005, they had successfully bid for the right to use the spectrums until 2015.

IDA gave the go-ahead for these operators to offer 4G services using their eixsting radiofrequency spectrums. These Telcos can seek approval from IDA to do so and the approval could be completed in a matter of weeks.

IDA did not mention the 700MHz band although it is included in the 4G standard.

Beyond 2015

Beyond 2015, IDA is planning to re-allocate rights to the wireless broadband spectrum. IDA will hold an auction for six lots of 4G wireless spectrum rights next year.

“SingTel is exploring all options available and is working closely with network providers to ensure commercial LTE services can be introduced to our customers in good time,” said a SingTel spokesperson.Thus far, SingTel, StarHub and M1 have announced plans to roll out a 4G technology based on the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard.

M1 has completed its LTE trials in April 2010 and will be upgrading its network to LTE in 2011.

A StarHub spokesperson said that StarHub is “currently conducting technical trials of LTE.”

4G networks have already been rolled out in the US and a few4G handsets have already been launched by some smartphone makers.

Use of the 4G network in Singapore will probably begin on laptops using dongles. 4G smartphones and tablets will only come later, probably in 2012, but more likely in 2013.

However, the main driving factor of WHEN a 4G network in Singapore will really take off depends on whether consumers or business users can find a compelling need to migrate from an already speedy 3G network to the new network, presumably at an increased cost.

The IDA has gotten off to a good start by laying down the blueprint early for all interested parties to plan their hardware and network investments, as well as to clarify the usage of the relevant spectrums.

The gauntlet is now thrown to the Telcos to work out the detailed standards and spectrum allocation, price plans and services to exploit the broader bandwidth.

Background of Eric E Schmidt

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

Based on the profile of Eric E Schmidt by The New York Times (excerpt below), he is as solid a manager as Tim Cook from Apple.

Before coming to Google, Mr. Schmidt was chief executive of Novell, a staid computer networking company in Provo, Utah. At Novell, he led strategic planning, management and technology development from 1997 until 2001.

Eric E Schmidt, Google IncBefore joining Novell, Mr. Schmidt was chief technology officer at Sun Microsystems, where he worked for 14 years. At Sun, he led the team that developed the popular Java programming language. Mr. Schmidt, who holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of California at Berkeley, was also a researcher at the Palo Alto Research Center, or PARC, the institution that helped to develop laser printing, the graphical user interface and the Ethernet.

Mr. Schmidt, born 1955, has spent much of his career battling Microsoft, first at Sun Microsystems and Novell, and now at Google. His resentment of Microsoft, it seems, stems in part from his view that it is a triumph of market muscle over superior technology — a common belief in Silicon Valley.

In 2008, Mr. Schmidt led Google’s effort to scuttle Microsoft’s $44.6 billion bid for Yahoo. But Google walked away from a controversial advertising partnership with Yahoo after the Justice Department notified the companies that it would file an antitrust suit to block it.

Here’s his full profile from The New York Times.